Rosa v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Michael Rosa appeals from his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine.
Rosa’s appeal of his conviction challenges the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which a search warrant issued. While we have found this a close case, we conclude that the affidavit contained enough “reliable information .. . set forth in sufficient detail to warrant a reasonably prudent [person] in believing that a criminal offense has been . .. committed,” 1 and, therefore, that probable cause for the search was shown.
A brief factual background is necessary for us to discuss our decision. The following…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Waters v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- State v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Lausterer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Linne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.