Legal Opinion

Rosa v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 17, 1981No. 5334PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Michael Rosa appeals from his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine.

Rosa’s appeal of his conviction challenges the sufficiency of the affidavit upon which a search warrant issued. While we have found this a close case, we conclude that the affidavit contained enough “reliable information .. . set forth in sufficient detail to warrant a reasonably prudent [person] in believing that a criminal offense has been . .. committed,” 1 and, therefore, that probable cause for the search was shown.

A brief factual background is necessary for us to discuss our decision. The following…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Waters v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  2. Lausterer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Snyder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  5. Linne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API