Legal Opinion
Petition of Fairchild
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 28, 1992No. 90-327PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The Town of Putney appeals from a superior court order granting petitioners’ motion for summary judgment and issuing a writ of mandamus that compels the Town to enjoin the owners of the Mellen Building from using the property in violation of the Town zoning regulations. We affirm.
This case began in June 1984 when the Town’s board of adjustment granted a conditional use permit for development of three one-bedroom apartments on the second and third floors of the Mellen Building. The building, a Putney Village structure, originally housed one apartment on its upper two floors and a retail store…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Charlotte v. RichmondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Town of Sandgate v. ColehamerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Garzo v. Stowe Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Bargman v. BrewerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Corcoran v. Village of BenningtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- Trickett v. OchsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Sagar v. Warren SelectboardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Kirk Wool v. Lisa Menard, Commissioner, Vermont Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Board of Trustees of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Board & Local 1369Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.