United States v. Jose Chavarriya-Mejia
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant-Appellant Jose Chavarriya-Mejia pleaded guilty to illegal entry into the United States. He appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court erred in applying a 16-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 because statutory rape is not a “crime of violence.” 1
BACKGROUND
In 1994 or 1995, Chavarriya-Mejia illegally entered the United States. While in the United States, Chavarriya-Mejia was convicted by a Kentucky state court of an aggravated felony: rape in the third degree. What Kentucky law defines as rape in the third degree is commonly known as “statutory rape.” 2 See Ky.Rev.Stat.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Bulmaro Rayo-Valdez, AKA Bulmaro Valdez RayoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Esly Pereira-SalmeronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Julio Gomez-Hernandez, United States of America v. Luis Alcaras-NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Abdulkhaleq Mugalli v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. MeaderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re American Airlines, Inc., Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Harry Lewis IvoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Chavarriya-Mejia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.