Legal Opinion

Elwell v. Olin

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moulton, Supr. J.

This case comes up on exceptions from the Bennington municipal court. It is an action of replevin for the carcass of a buck deer. The writ directed the officer serving the same to replevy the property and to deliver it to the plaintiff “provided he gives a bond in a penal sum which shall be total the appraised value of said carcass, with sufficient surety or sureties to prosecute his replevin, etc. ’ ’ The writ was served, the carcass replevied, and the officer took a bond for double the value, as the statute directed, and so stated in his return.

The defendants moved to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roy v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  2. Huntley v. HenrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  3. Town of Barton v. Town of SuttonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Stewart v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
  5. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  3. Murphy v. PuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Ramsey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  5. Howe v. Lisbon Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API