Legal Opinion · Dissent

Billy Sunday Birt v. Charles N. Montgomery, Warden, Georgia State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 11, 1983No. 82-8156Published

1DissentAlbert J. Henderson, Circuit Judge

The majority remands this case for a federal evidentiary hearing for two reasons: (1) that the statutory factfinding procedures prevented Birt from receiving a full and fair state hearing on the issue of his right to counsel of his choice, and (2) that, contrary to the district court’s holding, Birt’s appointed trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance, and Birt must now have the opportunity to show that he suffered actual prejudice as a result thereof. Because I do not believe that a new hearing is required for either reason, I respectfully dissent.

In Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API