Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, Chief Judge.
This is an ERISA action for insurance benefits allegedly due Plaintiff Lee Anne Smith (“Plaintiff’). Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiffs claim. Defendant brings two counterclaims, one under ERISA for reimbursement of overpaid benefits, the second for unjust enrichment. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on Defendant’s counterclaims. Defendant moves for summary judgment on its counterclaims as well. I address all three motions in this Order, grant both of Defendant’s motions, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Caldwell v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skinner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Garrison v. Administrative Committee of Delta Air Lines, Inc., TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Holt v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005