Legal Opinion

Holt v. Continental Casualty Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 19, 2005No. 04-4050-JARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBINSON, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on cross motions by the parties: plaintiff Ed Holt’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) and defendant Continental Casualty Company’s (Continental) Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42). There is no genuine issue of material fact precluding a determination that Continental reasonably interpreted the terms of the long term disability plan, nor any such issue of fact precluding a conclusion that Continental’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API