Legal Opinion
Lipscomb v. Lipscomb
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The above-entitled action is brought by the plaintiff to set aside, as void, a separation agreement entered into between the parties as husband and wife on or about March 4, 1940. The complaint alleges that the said agreement was entered into on the part of the plaintiff in this action by reason of certain alleged fraudulent representations theretofore made by the defendant which were relied upon' by plaintiff at the time the agreement was executed.
The defendant’s amended answer, in addition to a general denial of the alleged fraud, pleaded an affirmative defense of res judicata and two…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eleanor Holm v. Morris Shilensky, Arthur Cantor and Charles Wohlstetter, as Executors of the Estate of Billy Rose, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968