Legal Opinion

Cummins v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

There were cross appeals in this case and the cases were docketed separately in this court, one being No. 3663 and the other 3664. We shall consider them as consolidated in this court and dispose of them as one case.

This action is in replevin. A jury was waived and the case tried by the court. Judgment went for plaintiff for part of the property and for defendant for the remainder. . The costs were all taxed against defendant. Plaintiffs appealed from the entire judgment. Defendant also appealed but suggests in this court that if he be relieved from the judgment against him for costs, he will…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stonebraker v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Wilson v. MilliganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Bozeman v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Dierling v. PettitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Humphreys Savings Bank v. Carpenter and HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tobin v. KampeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. Bruce v. KaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. LepowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Barnard State Bank v. LankfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API