Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Kays

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, J.-

— This is an action upon a promissory note which with interest amounts to $371.96. When the suit was filed an affidavit for attachment was stied out. On the 27th day of January, 1926, the writ was delivered to the sheriff and he levied upon eight mules which were in the possession of defendant Kays. The Bank of Longwood iilecl an interplea claiming the mules under a recorded chattel morí -. gage. At the trial the Bank of Longwood offered in evidence a recorded chattel mortgage.’ The mortgage recites that the undersigned W. P. Kays of Houstonia, Missouri, does sell, assign, transfer…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stonebraker v. FordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Lafayette County Bank v. MetcalfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Chandler v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Estes v. SpringerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Bozeman v. FieldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gross v. Merchants-Produce BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Fisher v. Mikco Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. National Ass'n of Credit Men, Montana-Wyoming Unit v. MossWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Valleyfield Gin Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API