Legal Opinion
Gelco Builders, Inc. v. Holtzman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and determination of the respondent Comptroller of the City of New York, dated March 9, 1990, which found that petitioner violated Labor Law § 220 by failing to pay wages and supplemental benefits at the prevailing rates, and which awarded certain employees $369,486.15 for wage and benefit deficiencies, plus 16% interest thereon, and a civil penalty of 20%, is unanimously affirmed, petition denied and the proceeding brought *233pursuant to CPLR article 78 (commenced in this court pursuant to section 220 [8] of the Labor Law) is dismissed without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to Gelco’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Mid Hudson Pam Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Canarsie Plumbing & Heating Corp. v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perez v. Masonry Servs., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Ayala v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Waterway Construction Corp. v. SweeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Matter of Astoria Gen. Contr. Corp. v. StringerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.