Forest Products Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The first cause of action was based upon a breach of an alleged contract, and plaintiff claims damages for the following sums expended in the improvement of its plant and machinery for the manufacture of veneers; namely, for labor, superintendence, engineering and overhead, $18,500; materials, lumber, finding’s and fixtures for kilns, yard and mill, $12,850; for boiler, motor and fan, $3,300; for wires and clips for kilns, $1,000; aggregating $43,150 demanded on the first cause of action.
In the second cause of action plaintiff claims a contract for the sale of fifty carloads of veneer, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Robinson & Co. v. BerkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Hoskins v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Saum v. BonarOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Sedillo v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Rodgers Insurance Agency v. Andersen MacHineryOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Abraham v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Reynolds v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.