Legal Opinion

Forest Products Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The first cause of action was based upon a breach of an alleged contract, and plaintiff claims damages for the following sums expended in the improvement of its plant and machinery for the manufacture of veneers; namely, for labor, superintendence, engineering and overhead, $18,500; materials, lumber, finding’s and fixtures for kilns, yard and mill, $12,850; for boiler, motor and fan, $3,300; for wires and clips for kilns, $1,000; aggregating $43,150 demanded on the first cause of action.

In the second cause of action plaintiff claims a contract for the sale of fifty carloads of veneer, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Robinson & Co. v. BerkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Hoskins v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Saum v. BonarOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Sedillo v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Rodgers Insurance Agency v. Andersen MacHineryOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Abraham v. MackOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Reynolds v. KanzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API