Legal Opinion

Roukous v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 18, 1912No. 894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District' of Rhode Island. George,,Roukous. and another were convicted of an offense (170 Fed. 110), and they bring error. Affirmed as to Roukous;

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This was an indictment found in the District of Rhode Island against Carroll H. Chapman and George Roukous, who at the time of the finding of the indictment and of the alleged offense set out therein were residents of Providence, R. I., and Joseph Adams, a resident of Rockland, in the state of Maine. All three were convicted, but Chapman sued out no writ of error. In accordance with the settled practice, the other two, Roukous and Adams, were entitled to sue out writs of error without joining Chapman. All we need extract from the indictment is as follows:

“That the Young…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Thomas v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Field v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Alkon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
  2. United States v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1917
  3. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
  4. Conetto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  5. Frankfurt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API