Alkon v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. <-
1Opinion of the Court
PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.
Barish and Alkon were indicted for a conspiracy, the substance of which was that Barish should purchase goods, and Alkon should conceal them, and that afterwards Barish should go into bankruptcy, and the concealment should continue after the bankruptcy, with the intention that at some subsequent time the profit by the concealment should be divided between Barish and Alkon. Both were convicted, but the only writ of error before us is Alkon’s.
We are informed by our own records, to which by the settled rules we are authorized to turn, that Barish sued out a writ of error,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Tucker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jelke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Gerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Radin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.