United States v. Dean S. Hazel, (81-1616), James G. Lott, (81-1630)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal by defendants/appellants Dean Hazel (Hazel) and James Lott (Lott) asserting that selective prosecution and improper jury instructions require reversal of their convictions for income tax-related offenses. Although each appellant was separately indicted and tried, they were represented by the same counsel and the appeals raise an identical issue.
These cases arise out of a self-described “tax revolt” in Michigan which Hazel and Lott claim to have “co-founded”. The movement, embodied in an organization named “We the People A.C.T.”, is said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Bernard M. PeskinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Richard Ralston CatlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Spiver Whitney GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gene R. "Moon" MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gilberto Redondo-LemosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.