Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean S. Hazel, (81-1616), James G. Lott, (81-1630)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 5, 1983No. 81-1616, 81-1630PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal by defendants/appellants Dean Hazel (Hazel) and James Lott (Lott) asserting that selective prosecution and improper jury instructions require reversal of their convictions for income tax-related offenses. Although each appellant was separately indicted and tried, they were represented by the same counsel and the appeals raise an identical issue.

These cases arise out of a self-described “tax revolt” in Michigan which Hazel and Lott claim to have “co-founded”. The movement, embodied in an organization named “We the People A.C.T.”, is said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Bernard M. PeskinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Richard Ralston CatlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. United States v. Spiver Whitney GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Gene R. "Moon" MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Gilberto Redondo-LemosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API