Legal Opinion

(PC) Warden v. Cowan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 18, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00431Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MASA NATHANIEL WARDEN, No. 2:19-cv-00431 MCE AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 B. COWAN; W. WILLIAMS; and N. WEAVER, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis and the 19 case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants have 20 moved for summary judgment. ECF No. 43. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion, ECF No. 21 48, and defendants replied. ECF No. 49. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API