Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY
This case presents a straightforward question concerning the reach of tort law. When the defendant designed a product intended to create a flame, it did not incorporate available inexpensive technology to make the product child-resistant. A child got hold of the product and started a fire that led to her sister’s death. Should the court consider the design defective because it lacked child-resistant features? We find the evidence in the record sufficient to pose a factual question of whether the design is defective.
BACKGROUND
Susan Calles purchased an Aim ’n Flame lighting rod in March 1998.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Lamkin v. TownerIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Rodney Todd, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Tiffany Todd v. Societe Bic, S.A., and Bic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Deborah Johnson v. Edward Orton, Jr. Ceramic FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.