Legal Opinion

Stearman v. Intergraph Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 6, 1991No. 90-02194PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellants challenge an order denying their motion to tax costs incurred in a prior appeal in this case and denying their motion for an award of attorney’s fees as a sanction against the appellee for failure to obey a discovery order, a failure which was discovered by the appellants during the pendency of the prior appeal. We reverse.

This case began as a suit by the appellants (Stearman) against the appellee (In-tergraph) for committing fraud in the sale of a certain architectural computer system to Stearman. Stearman prevailed at trial and the trial judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. INTERGRAPH CORPORATION v. StearmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Okeelanta Corp. v. BygraveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Essenson v. Bloom (In re Bloom)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. JAMES L. ESSENSON v. DOROTHY B. BLOOM AND ROBERT M. ELLIOT, AS TRUSTEEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API