Legal Opinion

Okeelanta Corp. v. Bygrave

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1997No. Nos. 92-2773, 92-2792 and 92-2807PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOTION FOR REHEARING ON MOTIONS TO REVIEW ORDERS TAXING COSTS

WARNER, Judge.

We deny rehearing but withdraw our prior opinion on the motion to review orders taxing costs and publish the following in its place.

After our opinion was rendered in this appeal, four of the five appellants moved to tax costs pursuant to Florida Rule of Appel*951late Procedure 9.400(a). The trial court entered judgments in favor of each appellant for their respective taxable appellate costs together with interest at the rate of 10% per year.

The appellees contend that because this court remanded for further proceedings,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. SchockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Okeelanta Corp. v. BygraveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERN. v. SchellerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Melvin v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Stearman v. Intergraph Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Essenson v. Bloom (In re Bloom)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. JAMES L. ESSENSON v. DOROTHY B. BLOOM AND ROBERT M. ELLIOT, AS TRUSTEEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API