Legal Opinion

Dobransky v. Adams Express Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1921No. Appeal, No. 318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 318, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia, Dec. T., 1918, No. 576, for plaintiff in the case tried by the court Avithout a jury in suit of Paul Dobransky v. Adams Express Company. Assumpsit to recover the value of goods lost while in the custody of an express company. Before Crane, J., without a jury. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 318, Oct. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of the Municipal Court of Philadelphia, Dec. T., 1918, No. 576, for plaintiff in the case tried by the court Avithout a jury in suit of Paul Dobransky v. Adams Express Company. Assumpsit to recover the value of goods lost while in the custody of an express company. Before Crane, J., without a jury. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court entered judgment for plaintiff for $150. Defendant appealed. Error assigned ivas order of the court overruling defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff sued defendant for the value of a trunk and contents shipped by him from Ansonia, Connecticut, to Philadelphia, and never delivered. A jury trial was waived. The trial judge found in favor of the plaintiff for $144.85, which, on opinion filed was increased to $150, the value stated in defendant’s shipping receipt, and judgment entered accordingly. Defendant appealed and assigns as error the refusal of the court below to enter judgment in its favor.

Defendant contended that judgment should have been entered for it, because, it alleges, there was no evidence that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Concordia Silk Hosiery Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Di Donato v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinsey Distilling Corp. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API