Deitch v. Kessler
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages and alleges in his complaint four causes of action: the first, in conversion, the second, in conspiracy, the third, in duress and the .-fourth, in usury. The case was tried without a jury.
The undisputed evidence in essence established that plaintiff and defendant Kessler were the sole stockholders of Kesdiet Realty Corp. (hereinafter referred to as K Corp.) Plaintiff owned 49 shares of the stock and Kessler 51 shares. K Corp. ’s sole asset was some 20 odd acres of land, purchased for the purpose of constructing houses thereon for resale. On August 30, 1954…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pettit v. Olean Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Deitch v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Newington v. RamsayNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Pettit v. Olean Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.