Legal Opinion

Deitch v. Kessler

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages and alleges in his complaint four causes of action: the first, in conversion, the second, in conspiracy, the third, in duress and the .-fourth, in usury. The case was tried without a jury.

The undisputed evidence in essence established that plaintiff and defendant Kessler were the sole stockholders of Kesdiet Realty Corp. (hereinafter referred to as K Corp.) Plaintiff owned 49 shares of the stock and Kessler 51 shares. K Corp. ’s sole asset was some 20 odd acres of land, purchased for the purpose of constructing houses thereon for resale. On August 30, 1954…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Toplitz v. . BauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Adrico Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Hornstein v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pettit v. Olean Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Deitch v. KesslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  3. Newington v. RamsayNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Pettit v. Olean Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API