Legal Opinion
Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 23, 1923No. 23,184PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Tliis action was brought to reform a written contract on the ground of mutual mistake.
Prior to December 24, 1913, Victor E. Segerstrom had been in the business of manufacture and sale o'f pianos, and was the owner of the trade name and label “Segerstrom” as applied to pianos and musical instruments. On that day an agreement in writing was made, for the sale of said trade name and label to the defendant Holland Piano Manufacturing Company, in consideration of 100 shares of that company’s stock of the par value of $10,000, to be issued and delivered to Ruth E. Segerstrom, Victor’s daughter. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- In re Van NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Wall v. MeilkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franciscan Hotel Co. v. Albuquerque Hotel Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924