Legal Opinion

THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE COMPANY v. LAUREL PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATES, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00235Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE MEDICAL PROTECTIVE CoO., ) and PRINCETON INSURANCE CoO. ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) v. ) Civil No. 3:23-cv-00235 ) Judge Stephanie Haines LAUREL PEDIATRIC ASSOCIATES, ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. —_) ) OPINION The Medical Protective Company (“MedPro”) and the Princeton Insurance Company (“Princeton”) filed this Complaint in civil action (ECF No. 1) to seek a judicial determination and declaration pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 2201

and 2202. MedPro and Princeton seek a declaration that they do not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Kvaerner Metals Division of Kvaerner US, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Revell v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Rosenau v. Unifund Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API