Legal Opinion
United States v. Gelb
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 24, 1991No. 9:90-cv-01543PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PLATT, Chief Judge.
Defendants have moved on various grounds for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is denied in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
This civil action stems from a criminal case 1 brought against defendants Bernard Gelb and EDP Medical Computer Systems, Inc. (“EDP”). A grand jury returned a superseding indictment on July 16, 1987, naming as defendants Bernard Gelb and EDP. The central charge was that Bernard Gelb had violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by conducting (through EDP) a pattern of racketeering…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- United States v. Richard Coluccio, Theresa Coluccio, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. RostoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard ColuccioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.