Legal Opinion
PayoutOne v. Coral Mortgage Bankers
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 9, 2009No. Civil Action 08-cv-01617-PAB-MJWPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff PayoutOne, LLC (“Payout”) brings this action asserting claims against two parties that allegedly caused it harm in connection with a loan to a third party. The matter is presently before the Court on defendant Coral Mortgage Bankers’ (“Coral”) Amended Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Docket No. 20]. Jurisdiction in this case is premised upon diversity of the parties as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2006).
I. FACTS
A. Factual Background
The following facts are taken from plaintiff Payout’s Amended Complaint and are presumed to be true…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. AlemayehuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Clark v. Green Tree Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Buckles Management, LLC v. Investordigs, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. AlemayehuDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Fisher v. Community Banks of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.