Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Timber Products Inspection, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 13, 2004No. Civil 02-961-MOPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jerry Anderson is the named plaintiff for this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) representative action brought on behalf of himself and his coworkers (collectively, “plaintiffs”) and against defendant Timber Products Inspection, Inc. Plaintiffs seek recovery for wages allegedly due under FLSA’s overtime provisions as well as Oregon’s similar provisions. Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiffs were exempt from overtime-wage requirements pursuant to the “Motor Carrier Act exemption.” The court agrees with defendant and thus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Roger W. Crooker v. Sexton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Friedrich v. U.S. Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Sinclair v. Beacon Gasoline Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976
  5. Turk v. Buffets, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API