Legal Opinion
Davis v. City of Hollywood
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 1997No. 95-5304, 95-5536PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
In this action based on the Fair Labor Standards Act, we affirm the district court’s ruling that the appellee avoided liability through the exercise of the “window of correction.”
BACKGROUND
On October 1, 1992, appellants, nineteen present and former management employees of appellee City of Hollywood (the City), filed this lawsuit pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., in the Southern District of Florida. Appellants alleged that the City willfully failed to pay them overtime as required under section 207(a)(1), which provides that covered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jonah Oxman v. Wls-TvCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Avery v. City of TalladegaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Dean A. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIS-CHALMERS, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Block v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- O'Brien v. Town of AgawamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.