Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Matthews

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 1, 1813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Ch. J. Boyle.

Patterson brought an action of trespass quare clausum freg'it et bortis asportatis in the Pulaski circuit court, against Glover Matthews and Nancy Matthews his wife, Nathaniel Matthews and Elizabeth Wilson. The original writ was returnable to the October term 1809, was directed to the sheriff of Clark county, and executed upon Clover Matthews and wife, and Elizabeth Wilson, the 18th of, September, and a copy of the declaration delivered. An alias issued against Nathaniel Matthews, directed to the sheriff of Pulaski, and was executed during the October term…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noe v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Payton v. McQuownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  3. Callahan Construction Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. How v. BodmanOhio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1856
  5. Legrand v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API