Legal Opinion

Legrand v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 3, 1827Published

Covenant. Appeal from the Fayette Circuit; Jesse Bledsoe, Judge. Error. Practice. Res judicata. Release. Evidence. Damages. Payment. Joint obligors. New trial. Surprise. Attorneys.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bibb

On the second of December, 1816, articles of agreement were signed and sealed between Legrand of the one part, and Baker, Boles and Profather of the other part, by which the latter sold and covenanted to deliver to the former, certain quantities of flour, pork and lard, at stipulated prices, by the fifteenth of February, 1817, at the Lower Blue Licks; and the said Legrand also Agreed to take three Orleans boats, at one hundred dollars each; Legrand covenanted to pay for the flour, pork, lard and boats, in Kentucky banknotes, two-thirds of the agreed prices to be paid upon do *236livery, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API