Legal Opinion

People v. Wittersheim

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 150, Calendar No. 34,835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Defendant seeks review by writ of error of his conviction and sentence on a charge of rape of a female above the age of 16 years.

Error is assigned upon the admission in evidence of the clothing which the prosecutrix testified she had worn at the time of the assault, and the admission of the testimony of a doctor that defendant had bruises on his shoulder at the time of his arrest, which occurred a few days later. This evidence was received without objection. We might well rest decision upon the general rule, so often stated by this court, that such alleged errors will not be considered unless…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CorderMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. BarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. CammarataMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API