Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Garrett Corp. & Frank IX & Sons New York Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.
The petitioner has moved to stay arbitration. The respondent has cross-moved to compel arbitration. Special Term found doubt as to the existence of written contracts and this issue was set down for trial (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1450; 15 Mise 2d 1033 [Epstein, J.]; order entered Nov. 12, 1958).
Respondent manufactures textile piece goods. Previously petitioner had purchased greige and other raw textiles from respondent for use in the manufacture of life rafts for the United States Navy. In each instance, except one, petitioner forwarded signed purchase orders and respondent forwarded written…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re the Arbitration Between Albrecht Chemical Co. & Anderson Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Helen Whiting, Inc. & Trojan Textile Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re the Arbitration Between Bullard & Morgan H. Grace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Garett Corp. & Frank Ix & Sons New York Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Sweet Adeline, Inc. v. Mag-Knit Fabrics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969