National Labor Relations Board v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of its order against Harbison-Fischer based on its finding that two of the respondent’s supervisors interrogated employees concerning their union activities in such a manner as to constitute interference, restraint, and coercion within the meaning of § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Rela*739tions Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1). The complaint against the employer charged that an employee named Maddux had been discriminatorily discharged in violation of § 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3). The complaint also charged that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hendrix Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Camco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- National Labor Relations Board v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals, a Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ambox, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.