Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Harbison-Fischer Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1962No. 19105_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge.

The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of its order against Harbison-Fischer based on its finding that two of the respondent’s supervisors interrogated employees concerning their union activities in such a manner as to constitute interference, restraint, and coercion within the meaning of § 8(a) (1) of the National Labor Rela*739tions Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1). The complaint against the employer charged that an employee named Maddux had been discriminatorily discharged in violation of § 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3). The complaint also charged that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hendrix Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Camco, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemicals, a Division of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Ambox, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API