Legal Opinion
Humility of Mary Health Partners v. Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 2003No. 4:02 CV 02041Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. # 12; Dkt. # 14.)
I. FACTUAL HISTORY
The Plaintiff, Humility of Mary Health Partners (“HM”), operates a health care center located in Youngstown, Ohio. (Dkt. #1 ¶ 1.) The Defendant, Local No. 377, Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (“the Union”), is the collective bargaining representative for certain hourly employees of HM. (Dkt. # 4 ¶ 1.) HM and the Union are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) setting forth…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.