Legal Opinion
Conn v. Hardin
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided June 22, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion óp the Court by
Commissioner Sandidge
Affirming.
The questions presented by this appeal may be correctly determined only by correctly interpreting the will of Joseph P. Gheens, the pertinent parts of which read:
“First: I give to my dear wife,- Mary V. Gheens, all rents and profits arising from my real estate, dioses in action, notes, and all money I may have in bank after all of my just debts have been paid.
“Second: After the death of my wife the real estate is to be divided between my daughter, Alice G. Conn, and the two children -of my deceased son, Chas. R. Gheens, share and -share…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lachland's Heirs v. Downing's Ex'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850
- McFatridge v. HoltzclawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Purnell v. CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Brown's Ex'r v. Brown's DeviseesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
- Hughes v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shackelford v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Hatchett's Ex'r v. LelandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- West v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931