Legal Opinion

Renn v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 26, 1943No. Record No. 2620PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

*362Mrs. Renn, who was a defendant in the trial court, acquired by purchase in 1933, from Bertha R. Barclay and husband, a lot, and residence thereon, at the town of Virginia Beach, which was a part of a subdivision called “Ubermeer”, which was a development, by lots, streets and ways, with town conveniences, of a tract of land containing some 131 acres.

There were two maps or plats of this subdivision which were recorded in the appropriate deed books. The first was vacated by a deed of vacation of June 1914, but the second was retained and adhered to, as a muniment of title, and bears date, June,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanders v. DixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Whitehurst v. BurgessSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Springer v. GaddySupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Minner v. City of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  2. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Traylor v. HollowaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  4. Sloan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. Ault v. ShipleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API