Legal Opinion

Karnes v. Keck

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided August 22, 1935No. 524-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The defendants file herein their motion to dismiss the action, alleging that the same is barred by the statute of limitations of Illinois. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him, according to the allegations of his complaint, on May 21, 1933. Affidavits in support of the motion disclose that the alleged assault, from which the injuries are claimed to have resulted, occurred on May 21, 1933. Counsel for plaintiff stipulate that the assault occurred on that date.

The records show that the complaint was filed in February, 1935, but that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. People ex rel. Greenwood v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. O'Connell v. Chicago Terminal Transfer RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Riley v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Haefer v. HerndonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1938
  4. In Re Union League Club of Chicago. O'Malley v. Union League Club of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Riley v. Union Pac. R.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API