Legal Opinion

Haefer v. Herndon

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided March 7, 1938No. 18692PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGGLE, District Judge.

The plaintiff instituted this proceed-' ing in the District Court on February 19, 1937, by the filing of her complaint herein. She alleges, among other things, that she is a resident of the State of Missouri, and that-the defendant is a resident of the 'State of Illinois, and that her cause of action arises out of a claim against the defendant for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile collision in the State of Missouri, on July 18, 1934, which she avers to have been due to the negligence of the defendant. The defendant • interposes a motion to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Theroux v. Northern Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Bernard Food Industries, Inc. v. The Dietene CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Horvath v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Anderson v. LintonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API