Legal Opinion
Utica National Insurance Co. v. Texas Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 14, 2003No. 03-01-00045-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK KIDD, Justice.
Utica National Insurance Company of Texas (“Utica”) appeals the judgment of the trial court declaring that Utica had a duty to defend and a duty to indemnify its policyholders and ordering Utica -to pay damages on behalf of its insureds. The Texas Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association (“the Association”) appeals the trial court’s decision to apportion Utica’s defense costs on a pro rata basis and the trial court’s refusal to charge additional damages to Utica based on article 21.55 of the Texas Insurance Code. Tex. Ins.Code Ann. art. 21.55 (West Supp. 2001).…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Hudson Energy Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Royal Insurance Company of America v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Royal Ins Co of Amer v. Hartford Undwr InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Utica National Insurance Co. of Texas v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004