Legal Opinion

Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp. v. Chandler

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 12, 1876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort for the obstruction of a way. The plaintiff claims under a deed from Luther Eames to the aqueduct company, dated November 28, 1795, conveying a mill lot and “ also the privilege of a certain highway appertaining to said mill.” It may be-that it cannot maintain this claim, as it has no title to the mill lot to which this way was appurtenant. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corporation v. Chandler, ante, 1. But this is not material in this case, as the presiding justice, who tried the case without a jury, has found as a fact that the plaintiff has acquired by prescription a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayford v. SpokesfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Row v. Home Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Richardson v. TumbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API