Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 29, 2002No. Civ. 00-40094, CR. 81-50046PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is a motion for a certificate of appealability (“COA”), filed by Petitioner Frank Reynolds [docket entry 229]. Petitioner is seeking to appeal this Court’s denial of his motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and this Court’s denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. For the reasons set forth below, this Court will grant in part and deny in part Petitioner’s motion.

Petitioner filed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API