Legal Opinion

Vandriest v. Midlem

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1983No. 82-507PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The controlling question in this appeal is whether appellee is entitled to the immunity from suit provided by the workers’ compensation *184statutes.1 If Crestview, appellee’s employer, was also appellant’s employer, then appellant’s action is barred by R.C. 4123.74 and 4123.741. If the school district was not appellant’s employer, however, then appellee may not invoke the statutory immunity.

This court considered a related issue in Daniels v. MacGregor Co. (1965), 2 Ohio St. 2d 89 [31 O.O.2d 141], and Campbell v. Central Terminal Warehouse (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 173 [10 O.O.3d 342]. Daniels and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. MacGregor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Coviello v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Campbell v. Central Terminal WarehouseOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Behner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Keller v. Old Lycoming TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Foran v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Stanadyne, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ferguson v. DyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Held v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Republic-Franklin Insurance v. City of AmherstOhio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API