Legal Opinion
Kara Technology Inc. v. stamps.com Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 24, 2009No. 2009-1027, 2009-1028PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Kara Technology (Kara) appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, following a jury trial, that Stamps.com did not infringe various claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,505,179 (the '179 patent) and 6,735,575 (the '575 patent) with its Pre-Version 5 (Pre-V5) or Versions 5 and later (V5) products. Kara also appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Stamps.com on its breach of contract claim. The court ruled, as a matter of law, that Stamps.com did not breach its nondisclosure agreement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Brooks Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Dutailier International, Inc. And Dutailier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Geraghty & Miller, Inc. v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eon Labels, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Plantronics, Inc. v. Aliph, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.