Legal Opinion
S.M. v. State
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 31, 2006No. 20050912-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THORNE, Judge:
¶ 1 S.M. (Mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s October 12, 2005 Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Terminating Parental Rights (the Termination Order), which terminated Mother’s parental rights in her children B.R., J.R., N.R., and K.M. (the Children). We reverse the Termination Order as it applies to Mother and remand this matter for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 “ ‘Because the termination of parental rights is fact sensitive, we review the facts of the controversy in detail.’ ” In re A.H., 2004 UT App 39, ¶ 1 n. 1, 86 P.3d 745 (quoting In…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- In re J. P.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. BrUtah Supreme Court · 2007