Legal Opinion

Balt. Cotton Duck v. Md. Insurance Comm'r

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 25, 2023No. 0951/22Published

1Opinion of the Court

Baltimore Cotton Duck, LLC v. Ins. Comm’r of the State of Md., et al., No. 951, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Nazarian, J. INSURANCE – FINANCIAL IMPAIRMENT – SUPERVISORS, LIQUIDATORS, CONSERVATORS, REHABILITATORS OR RECEIVERS – POWERS AND DUTIES Once an Insurance Commissioner is appointed receiver, the Commissioner may, either directly or through an agent, disavow or amend existing contracts for impaired insurers in order to protect insureds, creditors, and the general public. There is an important state interest in protecting health insurance policyholders, creditors, and the general…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API