Legal Opinion

In Re the Will of Cassada

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEkvin, J.

The probate of a will is a proceeding in rem, and there are in a strict sense no parties to an issue of devisavit vel non. In re Lomax, 226 N. C., 498, 39 S. E. (2d), 388. But the courts put pro-pounders and caveators in the category of parties for the purpose of ruling upon the admissibility of their admissions and declarations in will contests. See Page on Wills (Lifetime Ed.), Vol. 2, sections 801, 802, 803.

The exception of the caveators to the introduction of the declaration of Dewey Cassada presents this question for determination: "Where several heirs at law and next of kin caveat an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. In Re Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ramseyer v. DennisIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re the Revocation of the Probate of the Will of MyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanks v. Norfolk & Western R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API