Legal Opinion

Boecker v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1955No. 29237PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is a suit by the insured against two insurance companies upon a policy of automobile insurance jointly issued by them.

The cause originated in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis. Insured filed a petition alleging that during the term of the contract of insurance “plaintiff sustained a loss, for which defendants are obligated under their contract to indemnify plaintiff” but which insurers have failed and refused to do, and that the refusal was vexatious. Insured prayed for $132.64 under the contract plus 10% for vexatious delay and an attorney’s fee. After…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Providence Washington Insurance v. ProffittTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  3. Bruener v. Twin City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ploe v. International Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Freese v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Madison Block Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. Varble Ex Rel. Varble v. StanleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Lincoln v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Williams v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Eby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API