Legal Opinion

Keesling v. Beegle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2008No. 18S04-0704-CV-150PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Both Congress and the Indiana General Assembly have passed statutes called “RICO Acts” to combat “racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations.” There is a conflict between opinions of the Court of Appeals as to whether liability under the Indiana RICO Act extends only to persons who direct racketeering activity (the rule under the Federal RICO Act) or extends below the managerial or supervisory level to a racketeering enterprise’s “foot soldiers” as well. Because the Indiana Act uses language significantly broader than that of the Federal Act, we conclude that it imposes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. Frank Oreto, Sr., United States of America v. Frank Oreto, Jr., United States of America v. Dennis PetrosinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. Rubera, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul S. RuberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
  5. Yoder Grain, Inc. v. AntalisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ashonta Kenya Jackson v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Tru-Cal, Inc. v. Conrad Kacsik Instrument Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Ashonta Kenya Jackson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Kathie and Joe Boyer v. Kai Morimoto, MD and Plastic Surgery NorthwestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Seth A. Miller v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API