Legal Opinion

People v. Henley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1981PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jones, J.

The lack of probable cause to sustain the custodial detention and transportation of one defendant operates to vitiate his ensuing consent to the search of the defendants’ apartment. As to the other defendant, however, that consent is valid. The evidence seized in the apartment should therefore be suppressed as to one defendant but not as to the other.

Based on a radio call that a burglary was in progress at the Mercury Radio and Battery Company received about 4:00 A.M. on December 6, 1976 the police proceeded to the scene. About one block away defendant Jim Henley,…

2Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. PonderNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. People v. NicodemusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. BorgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API