Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Gordon Investment Corp.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 29, 1967No. [No. 324, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornBy, J.

Finan, J. dissents.

This action brought by a tenant against a landlord and the counteraction brought by the landlord against the tenant presents a question as to which party is entitled to use an exterior wall of the leased premises to advertise their respective business enterprises.

The tenant is a partnership consisting of David and Feonard Schuman trading as D & F Manufacturing Company (the Schumans or tenants), who are assemblers and distributors of dinette furniture. The landlord is Gordon Investment Corporation (Gordon or landlord), a real estate corporation which owns and leases property…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Thomas Roberts & Co. v. BonaparteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  3. Kelley Construction Co. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Gross v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Sommers v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. MATEER T/A SUMMIT HILL RADIO & TV v. Reliance Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. ADMIRAL BUILDERS SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. South River Landing, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Atlas Lubricant Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co. of NJLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Davidson v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API