Legal Opinion

Gyory v. Radgowski

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1974Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeon D. Lazer, J.

In this action to recover for injuries sustained in an Ohio automobile accident, the defendants, Edward Radgowski ("Radgowski”) and the Hertz Corp. ("Hertz”), have pleaded the Ohio Guest Statute as a limitation on their liability and the Workmen’s Compensation Law as an affirmative defense. The plaintiffs move to dismiss both defenses.

Plaintiff Frank Gyory ("Gyory”) and Radgowski, New York domiciliaries, were sent to Dayton, Ohio for business reasons by their common employer. Although Gyory’s trip was scheduled to be of one day’s duration, he elected to extend his stay for an additional day…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Claim of Davis v. Newsweek MagazineNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Claim of Nashko v. Standard Water Proofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Claim of Pasquel v. CoverlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Pahmer v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API